Synchronicity

So after quite the hiatus, I wrote a really lame post last night. I actually wrote a very offensive post last week, but the fact that my iPhone didn’t save it was taken by me as a sign not to post that crap. It never ceases to amaze me how paying attention to “signs” can often work in your favor. Naysayers will probably suggest that looking for signs is a bunch of BS in the same vein of hindsight being 20/20, and the “signs” that don’t end up meaning anything are conveniently ignored. But seriously, who gives a fuck about the opinions of people who run around saying nay, I mean it’s 2009, update your fucking lexicon!

So at some point I should probably get to the er, point which is this: Last night I finished my post with what I thought was a totally random although not unique thought. That thought was, of course FUCK TIME WARNER.

I’m pleased to say that through the amazing power of synchronicity (known in some circles as coincidence and others as quantum mechanics), Verizon FIOS will be replacing Time Warner in my life in every way. My hope is that they restrict their service delivery to cable, phone, and internet, and leave out the abuse, theft and damage to my stomach lining.

Viva le FIOS!

And for good measure, fuck Time Warner.

I’m worried.

That I may have alienated the 6 people who read this by not posting for 2 weeks. I’m going to file this under useful stuff, even though it’s not useful. I figure I have to fill that category with something, and it’s unlikely to get filled on its own, what with all the opportunities to be completely useless at my disposal.

Fuck Time Warner.

Filed under [ useful stuff ] 4 Comments

It’s easier for girls to have sex with vegetables than it is for guys.

Discuss.

Filed under [ shorts ] 5 Comments

Who you were and who you are.

The girl I lost my virginity to told me tonight to go suck some gorilla balls. In her defense she was only using my own words against me but it does give me pause and make me think about where I was, lo those many years ago, and how far I’ve come in life since those tender teenage years.

It makes me think maybe not so far . . . or maybe quite far indeed, so much so that I’ve perhaps come full circle into something profoundly, um circular.

Guys want to bang girls.

What might seem at first blush to be the most obvious statement since Obama took office hides a hidden truth. It’s probably hiding it because I carefully crafted it to do so, but nevertheless it remains obscured. The reason why it does so is because most people take for granted that is a universal truth, a guy sees a hot girl, he wants to bang her, but I’m not sure that’s always true, even when he thinks it is.

I was just organizing my music collection (which is another hidden pain in the ass in a world that seems to have no end to how much tedious shit it wants to throw at me), and Natalie Imbruglia came on. Yeah I know kinda random, and yes you can guess that the thought that popped in my head is I want to bang that chick, AND yes, I’m ashamed whatever, screw u.

But the point is I shouldn’t be.

They sell sex to us so that we have a conditioned response when a song comes on to call the image of the sexy video, or some magazine like Maxim into our brains. The hidden truth here is I think most men are very enamored with the IDEA of banging some random hot girl, and it’s sort of a conditioned verbal response. Hot chick: yeah I wanna bang her, we see it on TV in movies and as men we’re expected to just be up and ready to fuck anything that looks good in a skirt. I think given the choice lots of men would decide to go the hanky panky route, but I also think it would be an ultimately disappointing experience. In this case I think the reality of fucking some hot celebrity would be a disappointment, might even be a bit uncomfortable, and lots of men in that situation probably would be contented with the knowledge that they could have done it, rather than to actually go through with it just at that moment.

Don’t get me wrong, if she was being all sexy and was really into it and inspired me I might just give her the most intense 2 minutes of her life (that’s actually lie, I’m an all night long brutha, but the 2 minutes thing is funnier), but it would be an eminently physical experience. Even the most shallow man out there understands on some unconscious level the relationship between intensity of orgasm and a human connection.

Of course that kind of talk will get you branded as “fag” in most sports bars, but the guys who are the most reluctant to admit that probably either #1 have not banged many (or any?) hot girls, or #2 are fags.

My apologies to Natalie Imbruglia and any of her descendants for her inclusion in this post.

Filed under [ observations ] 1 comment

If you take sex out of the equation, you get a bad quotient.

Discuss.

Filed under [ shorts ] 5 Comments

I can’t stand lazy people.

Everywhere you go there’s some lazy person standing around or something. Sometimes they don’t do anything, and like can’t even bothered to form coherent thoughts and it’s like why even bother? When I’m on my couch and I see something like that, it makes me want to do something about it.

I’ll finish this post in a bit.

Filed under [ rants ] 1 comment

There’s something to be said for saying something.

But not much, discuss.

Filed under [ shorts ] 2 Comments

The usefulness of items equation.

All items in the world have a hidden usefulness equation that determines how effective, but not necessarily how successful that product is in the real world. This equation is a work in progress (I just thought of it 5 minutes ago, but it’s been an idea I’ve had in the back of my mind for years), and it is based on several questions and factors.

1. Does the product work?

This might seem like a silly one to start with, but an unfortunately large amount of products either don’t do what they claim to do, or don’t work at all. That’s a weird thing to me. Is this something that’s thought of from the first concept, or is it a product idea that went horribly wrong and the manufacturers were like “Screw it, sell it anyway.” Either way you now have a piece of crap who’s best possible function in the universe is now to take up space. So they engage their advertising and packaging department, they decide on a a logo, what color to make it, the shape and design of the box, script out print and TV ads for this thing, just a monumental amount of time and money to bring something that’s about as useful as a pet rock to market. Then some jackass like me buys it.

2. If it does work, does it work properly, and are there any elements that make using it difficult?

Ever have something where you feel like you need to make some deal with a higher power right before you use it? Perhaps there’s some kind of ritual that needs to be performed before hand, like blowing on , it, shaking it, jiggling something, or banging your head into a wall. While these products are sometimes capable of performing their advertised task, they make you so mad you do the best you can to avoid it, see my Microsoft post. The worst part about these things is you feel like you don’t want to replace it because you kind of have something that works, and you feel like you’re wasting money on what might be frivolity.

3. How reliable is it? Does it work every time?

Instance of failure is related to #2, and is simply a question of whether it works every time (regardless of your actions) or in every situation.

4. Does it degrade over time, and if so, how fast is the degradation curve?

How long after buying this thing does it start to suck? Everything degrades over time, but the question is will it be a month, a year, or longer? This element needs to be cross referenced with price and expectations. There are many things we expect to degrade or fail quickly, such as many food items or additives, tooth brushes, razors, even toys for our kids or pets. We buy them with the idea they will used up, go stale, or be depleted in fairly short order. Then there are other items we see as solutions to problems, they fill certain needs, and we just expect the acquiring of those items to solve those problems. Some examples might be: I need to print something, I’ll get a printer, i need to call someone I’ll get a phone, I need to shoot something, I’ll get a gun (not sure on the actual usefulness of that last one but it does seem to be very popular, and it would be weird to live in a world when things aren’t being shot regularly). How long does it take before the shiny new ink jet printer you just bought starts printing documents and pictures in a way that makes you wonder whether it’s getting lazy and just not bothering to use blue anymore, or perhaps printing every other line and taking long cigarette breaks in between. Or that new phone you just bought that all of a sudden can’t handle being used for more than an hour before needing its charger like some kind of codependent chargeaholic. And I think we’ve all been there when there is a plain offensive tin can just begging to be shot, or a particularly rude deer, or your wife’s lover. The question here is what is the time frame? In my experience the tipping point for average items seems to be around 6 months. There is also an idea that more expensive items will last longer, and while I’ve found that to be true for the most part, the cost/quality/length of time ratios don’t always add up favorably.

5. How much maintenance does it require?

Do you ever find yourself not using something because you dread the amount of time or cost involved in just keeping the thing running, or replacing whatever filter/cartridge/battery/ you know will  oly last a few uses? Or maybe cleaning it after a use is a nightmare, so you do without. Whatever the story is here, this item generally performs its duties well, but rarely gets to do so because of the tedious aftermath of such a use.

6. Does it have an upside?

On some rare occasions there are those products that go above and beyond what you expect, or just turn out to be strangely indestructible. I recently purchased a cordless phone (I have been going through them at the rate of more than one a year, and not cheap ones) that actually had every single feature I was looking for, and then was surprised to hear it calling out the caller ID when I received a call. I’m a little ashamed at how tickled I am by that, but it would be meaningless if the thing wasn’t a horse, a charge on that phone is good for a couple of days. There are other items that won’t give up the ghost no matter how much of a pounding we give them. these sorts of things are few and far between and will no doubt have their models discontinued shortly because they clearly violate the merchandise laws of the universe, so it might be best to go out and buy another one while you have the chance.

I know I promised an equation here, but get real, this is a blog, and not even a good one, so any cool numerical charts will have to wait until the timing is favorable for me to give this more thought.

Chickenbutt.

Why doesn’t Microsoft just kick everyone’s ass?

I’m sort of a computer aficionado, a geek if you will. I’ve always had a cutting edge computer, often quite literally as I’ve cut my hands countless times while building my new bad ass PC. What confuses me is the fact that my computer doesn’t feel any faster than the computer I had 10 years ago.  It takes about the same amount of time to boot up, it’s about as responsive when I click or open something, and it locks up, crashes or plain malfunctions with about the same frequency. The major difference in my computing life has been an increase in internet speed, multimedia and gaming.

How is this possible? Microsoft is a huge, rich company with almost limitless resources, why do they seem incapable of taking advantage of the exponential increase in computing power that’s taken place over the past 10 years? My 2 year old Macbook is so much more responsive than my 1 month old super duper cutting edge PC workstation, it almost makes me want to blog about it. Is this some sinister plot to keep us upgrading, to always feel like the hardware we own is somehow inadequate? I feel like I’m constantly chasing some magical hardware setup that will finally not bog down when I open a new windows explorer window. Does it seriously take 5-10 seconds to figure out what my folders and icons look like in the same folder I open everyday with a system that’s so tweaked you can’t even buy one that fast from a store?

Is Apple so good because they are not mainstream and therefore don’t fall into the Budweiser/McDonald’s trap? Could Microsoft build something truly awesome if they wanted to, or have they gotten so bloated as a company they basically function as efficiently as the George W. Bush administration, thieving and bullying included?

  1. Windows Vista – People hate it and actually downgrade to an OS that came out 8 years ago.
  2. Office 2007 – A dog and a resource hog.
  3. Windows mobile phones – I had one of these, it made me think Naomi Campbell wasn’t trying to hurt her assistant, her Windows mobile phone had just frozen again.
  4. Zune – Turd.

Sleek, streamlined companies like Apple and Google are moving in to kick Microsoft’s ass with their simple, clear, responsive, flexible products. Will Microsoft be able to respond, or will they continue to thrash around like a headless chicken with nothing to do other than trip itself up, bump into things and, when it can get the firepower, shoot itself in the foot?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »