It really all depends on the physics involved, for example a 3 way with 2 120 lbs girls never equals a night with a 240lbs fatty . thats just sick.
now if u tame 2 17 year olds it does equal a one night stand with a 34 yr old cougar. its basic math. and common sense. now to the physics, its simple always leave when ur done dont stay the night, ( a body in motion needs to stay in motion) get out man before she starts talking relationship…….
Monkey
13 April, 2009,
I can’t do math.
thegleek
15 April, 2009,
geeks having sex can be equated to playing with lego’s. you stick an antenna up one lego’s arse and that’s what you get. geek sex. geeks don’t know the first thing about their own dick and what to do with it once it’s inside. minds well just let the porn do all the talking. porn. pleasuring the ladies can only be attributed to the trials and tribulations of failure. a lot of failures. that is the geeks success story.
5 Comments on “If you take sex out of the equation, you get a bad quotient.”
Hey you’re right! I tried it and I get ended up with one really sticky hand. I don’t like the way that added up at all.
It really all depends on the physics involved, for example a 3 way with 2 120 lbs girls never equals a night with a 240lbs fatty . thats just sick.
now if u tame 2 17 year olds it does equal a one night stand with a 34 yr old cougar. its basic math. and common sense. now to the physics, its simple always leave when ur done dont stay the night, ( a body in motion needs to stay in motion) get out man before she starts talking relationship…….
I can’t do math.
geeks having sex can be equated to playing with lego’s. you stick an antenna up one lego’s arse and that’s what you get. geek sex. geeks don’t know the first thing about their own dick and what to do with it once it’s inside. minds well just let the porn do all the talking. porn. pleasuring the ladies can only be attributed to the trials and tribulations of failure. a lot of failures. that is the geeks success story.
I have no frame of reference here